From dirty water to air pollution, UK is falling behind EU
Helena Horton Environment reporter · 20 Gen 2024
Vital legal protections for the environment and human health are being destroyed in post-Brexit departures from EU legislation, a detailed analysis by the Guardian reveals. Britain is falling behind the EU on almost every area of environmental regulation as the bloc strengthens legislation while the UK weakens it. In some cases, ministers are removing EU-derived protections entirely.
Businesses and environmental groups have told the Guardian they have been left in the dark on the extent of regressions because no government body is tracking the divergence. In practice, it means:
• Water in Britain will be dirtier than in the EU.
• There will be more pesticides in Britain’s soil.
• Companies will be allowed to produce products containing chemicals that the EU has restricted as dangerous.
At least seven major policies have been changed that have put a chasm between the EU and Britain on environmental regulation. These include: EU air pollution laws that will be removed under the retained EU law bill; dozens of chemicals banned in the EU still available in Britain; 36 pesticides banned in the EU not being outlawed here; Britain falling behind on reducing carbon emissions as the EU implements carbon pricing and compensates those who are struggling to afford the costs of the green transition, while the UK is not.
One green MEP said the findings were “tragic”, while a centre-right MEP said
the divergences were “particularly bad” for any companies that wanted to do business on both sides of the Channel.
Petros Kokkalis, a Greek MEP with the Left group, said: “It is rather worrying to see that Britain is not following the same path [as the EU]. And it is even more worrying to realise that it is the citizens and their health that will bear the consequences.”
About 85% of Britain’s environmental protections are EU derived. Despite Michael Gove, Boris Johnson and other architects of Brexit promising that environmental protections would be strengthened after leaving the EU, the Guardian’s analysis shows the opposite is the case.
The Guardian looked at data from the Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), which has been tracking divergences in environmental law since Britain left the EU, and for the first time the full scale of the regression can be laid bare.
There are 10 further policy areas that are in the process of being tightened in the EU while staying the same or being loosened in Britain. These concern sewage pollution in rivers and seas, protection for habitats of endangered animals, food waste, electronic waste, fast fashion, “forever chemicals”, ozone-depleting substances, extracting rare minerals, regulating dangerous particulate pollution, and reducing emissions from intensive farming.
Michael Nicholson, the head of UK environmental policy at IEEP UK, said: “The UK is quietly diverging from EU environmental law, particularly in England. We are increasingly seeing a trend towards the EU improving environmental laws and the UK not following suit. In some areas, there is a real danger of us going backwards.
“This backsliding is problematic because, not only will it weaken existing levels of environmental protection, [but] our trade and cooperation agreement with the EU has a specific legal commitment, repeated by multiple ministers, that the UK would retain high standards and not regress after Brexit.”
In Northern Ireland, the situation is more complex, as under the protocol it has to keep some EU-derived environmental laws. While this means there is technically more protection from chemical pollution and nature destruction, the differences in regulation between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK have implications for trade and politics.
Industry insiders in have told the Guardian that British businesses fear they will no longer be able to export to their biggest market as the divergence between Britain and the EU grows, to the extent that food and other products imported into Britain will no longer be able to be legally exported into the bloc. This is because certain chemicals are allowed for use in Britain but are being banned by the EU.
Agricultural industries say shipments are already being sent back by EU authorities because they contain products the EU has banned, and that the government has not notified businesses of these legal changes.
Ed Barker, the head of communications at the Agricultural Industries Confederation, said its members were struggling with lack of transparency about regressions from EU environmental law.
The shadow environment secretary, Steve Reed, said if his party won the general election, Britain “certainly won’t” fall below EU standards in future. “The government made promises that they only wanted the ability to vary standards so they could strengthen them.” There were many ways “in which they had reduced standards, the opposite of what they said they would do”.
He was “very, very” sympathetic to the idea of dynamic alignment, which would mean UK environmental regulations would automatically mirror those of the EU, but that the country would retain the power to diverge.
The environment secretary, Steve Barclay, defended its approach, saying: “Brexit gives us more freedoms.” “We have more trade attaches, we are unlocking more trade deals.”
Changes to the EU’s common agricultural policy in England, where farmers are paid to protect nature, meant “we can now design things that work for nature, but also work for the farming community”.
A Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs spokesperson said: “We are unequivocal about enhancing the UK’s already high standards on environmental protection. Our standards have never been dependent on EU membership.
“We have created an ambitious environmental programme – including new legally binding targets under the Environment Act and our environmental improvement plan to protect our environment, clean up our air and rivers and halt the decline of nature by 2030. It is inaccurate to say that the UK is falling behind the EU on environmental legislation, with many of our policies either equalling or going beyond EU targets.”
Shared via <a href=http://www.pressreader.com>PressReader.com</a> – Connecting People Through News <p><strong>PressReader – Connecting People Through News</strong>.</p><p>NewspaperDirect Inc. dba PressReader, 200-13111 Vanier Place, Richmond BC V6V 2J1, Canada<br /></p><p>©2003-2024 PressReader, All rights reserved. <a href=http://www.pressreader.com/help/TermsOfUse>Terms of Use</a> | <a href=http://www.pressreader.com/help/PrivacyPolicy>Privacy Policy</a>